|
Turkey,
Europe, Greece
Neptun EKEN
The
two shores of a sea Aegean and two countries. On one
hand two similar countries in their historical and cultural
relations, on the other hand for many along year great
differences not only in geological region but also in
their international policy and diplomacy.
Turkey and Greece two different countries in their histories
and origins, become similar in some topics (contents) in the
course of
time and they are based on very
sensitive equilibrium in foreign political zone
which changes day by day. They try to adopt new policies
according to their identity anxiety in Europe.
When we run an eye over the events between two countries,
it's possible to see the same panaroma just like after
the Independence War. There are great similarities in
the relations and problems.
Throughout the Lausanne Discusions (meeting)
after the war, Turkey and Greece solved their problems
about Turkish Muslim minorty in Greece and Rums
in Turkey easier
than the others. However, there are still lots
of problems
that became very strong
and unsolved between the two countries . (1)
For
example, the
event of the Greek Orthodox Church was arousing
the Rums who live in Turkey. From this point
of view, during the Lausanne meeting , Turkish side
tried to remove this mode
from Istanbul
and as a result according to Lord Curzon's proposal
, it's forbidden to be interested in political contents to the
Greek Church
.
Afterwords,
in the last months of 1924, because of the deportation
of Arapoglu, who was promated to the Patriarchian in
Istanbul, the relations stretched again between two
countries. Greece
tried to take the problem to Nations Association and
La haye , but
Turkey claimed that there was no authority of the international organs about
this content. (2)
Consequently
, in 1925 the
Patriarch receded and the problems solved. Although
two countries had on aggrement and opened embassies, the relations between
Turkey and Greece didn't calm down. In 1925 Turkish
Goverment sent
Mr . Cevat to Athena as the first Ambassodor , but unfortunety
until 1930 ,
the relations were not so friendly .
The
reason of
that disopproved events was insufficent
agreement about the problems. As from 1930 the relations
began to develop. There were reasons ; the first one was that the Italies alliance and amity
systems and the second one and the most important one
was Atatürk's and Venizelos's point of
views and exortions. (3)
Even in this kind of situation , two countries relations stretched and
they approched
over again. But Venizelos oriented his countries policys to his favour and
keep his country away from a battle.
At his
speech in 1930 (February) he mentioned that, "Turkey
was a peacefull country"
and he would obey the rules of the agreement
.
This speech made foreign policy of Greece softer
than before. Taking this fact into account, Ankara pleased
too much and in 1930 (June) the problems were solved
by them and this date left a mark in histories of both
countries. (4)
When
we look through
the relations , we can easly
see two opposite fact, the neighbourhood
and enmity. The problems were about Aegean
territoriel water, Continental shelf , FIR line , Air
Zone, Arming of Island and Cyprus.
Literally
"The Cyprus" matter is a gangrene in the relations
between Turkey and Greece and it caused a great difficulty
for Turkey to mix with Europe. It's an acceptable content
that Greece is one of the most important neighbour of
Turkey for either the man walking on the street or for
a foreign policy specialist . And some content can be
acceptable for
Greece. However their point of views of both countries
politics and public change day by day.
Turkey
and Greece guide their policy
according to the situation of the day . It's
more important to perceive
a danger not only as a harm but also
as a real danger for the parts for their individuals
in international area and relations. As we see it between
Turkey and
Greece, from
generation to generation , they saw each other as danger
and this beliefs insert the relations into a vicious circle.
After all , some self-seeker countries tried to use and direct
these dissensions between Turkey and Greece according
to their own advantage , because they knew that there was a great speaking and understanding
problem in the relations of both countries. And this
emity developed. As a result, the money spent for education
, health
and other spending
for the public are used for arming .
By
the little attention ,
we can understand that the reason of this is
lack of confidence , lack of dialog and enmity of both.
On the Greek side , Turkey which is five times greater population and six times larger in area makes
Greece loose reliance. But this stressed policy must
be not be develop with fears and wrong beliefs.
Both
sides politicians
know that if you want to
develop and combine, you have to find a foreign enemy . And
this fact used for an interior matter
for policy
by the Greeks, but this problems are always used
for Greek Goverment
and became an addiction. Taking this into acconut Turkey saw Greece
as a problem in front of entering
E.U. and saw 12 mile -- territoriel water problems
as a reason for a war. (5)
We
have relationship with E.U. approximately more than
40 years. After the settlement
of E.U. in 1958 , Turkey
made application to join
E.U. in 1959.
After
declarition of the republic and the II World War, Turkey
joined all of the political and security formations
like OECD and NATO.
As
a matter of fact
, Turkey could not be indifferent to this entegration
because of the
same reason ; connection with this subject to from begining
to today, as they had a purpose not only in economical
but also in political area in that topic.
After the earthquake in Turkey 1999 August, Greece
who was always against to Turkey changed her policy and created a new form in the
relations. What was the reason for that ?
The
first reason is, to form a union
between each other against USA and to solve the
problems in foreign policy and internal negativenes
to develop and improve on independent defence capasity first of all E.U. has
to create a strong policy.
It's more difficult then it is guessed and It's
not suitable to say, there is a general aggrement
for some contents more than a general foreing
policy for the E.U. Foreign policy can only come into
existence with an organized nation which form a nation
who can battle for It's own political volition.
Unfortuately E.U. is too far away from that kind of
a political formation
Countries are aware of their individual advantages
but they direct their policy according to this formation and
It seems that
the approching between Turkey and Greece is the cause
of that policy and for Turkey may be a signal
to join the E.U.
Greece
government improved a path in her foreign policy according
to the restraint of Europe, and her own public and by means of this poliy the two countries, Turkey
and Greece got closer. 17 August was a visible reason
and the milestone of this apporacing.
However
we can assume that there are lots of individual advantages
and policies at back side of this approching.
Normaly , countries always designate their policies and ways
according to their individuals advantages. As we clearly see this approaching between Turkey and
Greece is aresult the policies. The
changes in the world also have some effects on
our relations. Three years before today , "The
Kardak Crisis" and one year before today , "Abdullah
Öcalan Crisis", were great problem between Turkey and Greece. But foreign affairs minister of both countries Ismail Cem and Yorgo
Papenderuo made lots of positive changes in the relations
.
In Greece the path that Papenderuo followed, found support
from the public where the church and nationalist were
againts him and the approaching of the two countries
give chances to work in same areas together. Tourism
and the policy
at the Balkans are two simple
examples of that company.
Short time ago the relations between Turkey and Greece were
in danger and Greece had a foreign affair minister Pangolos
who has against to Turkey. Although these negativness
a certain modification happened and that attract attention of the other countries.
How and why does this changing begin?
After the earthquake that happend in Turkey urgent rescue
teams came to Turkey from all over the world
ever from Greece. Greece rescue team was one
of the first team which arrive to Turkey in quake disaster.
Greece rescue team came with their equipment and government health officials. Thus the approcacing began. Both countries
public governments managers understand that humanity
and the aminty side of this approaching was more important
than anything.
After Turkey's eartquake's happened, another earthquake happened in Greece,
and Turkey helped them in the same way like they helped
for us.
In the
realty both countires used the bad thougths and the
wrong informations in the school books , on the TV 's
and also in any other printied and visiual media against
each other for so long...
They growth the new generations, the
youth of Turkish and Greek as enemies.
Although
they are very closed as geography they live very
apart and ignorent having strange subconcious.
In the book, "Küçükasya
Felaketi" which was written by the Greek historion
Niko in 1977, speaking to the Greek policies
who try to introduce the Turkish people to the world
as "barbarian - genociding - spreading around
rapist capturer was the following written:
(6) " Anotolia rich in underground
wealth having as strategical importance and also the centre on the roads opening to the
east was valuable for impernationalists countries for
nutritions."
"The
wide hatred of Greece people against Turkish people
became a mad show by the praticing the Greek megalomania
and the Cristian Orthodox Greekness. Greek people couldn't
discriminate their own justice from the spreading injustice
borders."
Sometimes
some of the administrators of Greece were talking in
their own language, sometimes in different. The petrol
war in the middle east was considered as if it was the
megalomania of Greeks. The most utility of this idea
for the English colony policy were the problems for Greece.
Briefly,
Greece with
the pretex of protection of themselves, they serviced
for the foreigns' fragmentation policy. N.Psiruki
declares that the England used Greece and Venizelos
according to her
self-seeking about the petroleum in that region.
Form a Greek historian's point of view the megalomania of Greece
is an extension of the countries imperialist purposes
rather than her own goal. Truly Greece was a drawback
in front of the E.U., for us for years with the support
of the other strong countries, especially Germany.
Germany used Greece to protect and prevent from Turkish youth potential
who may have chance to travel across the Europe when
Turkey join the E.U.,
and developing economy of Turkey.
As I mentioned from the beginnig of this report the deficiency in the dialog
between Turkey and Greece tried to be solved by some.
However, the trials failed because of the unwillingness
of the governments. Today our relations are not in the
level of required but addition to this situation Turkey
is an candidate for nomination to E.U.
As I mentioned before the favour in the relations was a result
of Europeans request because they don't want an unconsistent
country in front of themselves and they dont want to
come face to face with a country who has terrorists
and Islamic confusion. According to this stiuation they
understand that Turkey may
bruise the benefit of Europe and Greece.
When
we look through the development of the events ve can
easly see the media of the both sides. Media in Turkey
who was the 3. strong force followed a racist attitude against Greece and never neglected
headlines full of
menace against Greece . Although media
didn't have those type rights , still they went to Kardak
and changed the flags and this would've caused a war.
Greece and Turkey have come close to war another two times
in the past 26 years over territorial disputes in the
Aegean and the divided island of Cyprus. However, the normal hostility lifted dramatically
last year following an outpouring of public aid and
sypathy for the victims of devastating earthquakes in
both countries. But it is strange that, same media changed
its attitude after the earthquake (17 AUGUST) and became
more positive and creative . Also we must not forget that the tears of a member of the rescue
team who rescued a girl under the ruins which was communicated
to us and all over the world without prejudice.
When we look through the past, we can easly see a different
mood today . Greece sometimes tried to take
some of the subjects that existed problems to La Haye.
But Turkey always overlook to this stiuation. When we
inspect the relations between Turkey and Greece, we
may think that there are lots of problems which seem
as if they can't be solved.
Even though the Cyprus problem the last incidents give some
chances to the results of the problems and maybe we
will have some chance to solve them.
Terrorism is the most important danger for Turkey and we
consider Greece
as a second danger for years. But we have to change
our mind against to Greece. According to some periphery
the countries have to continue this approaching with
some gesture.( Removement of Aegean army ). For years
Turkey has developed lots of possible war strategies
and is still making. Because of the changing in the
cast of the possible war strategies like 2-5 war strategy
, most of the scenarios changed. For example Turkey
suppose three main fronts, PKK, Syria and Greece and
establish the front lines according to that.
However , Turkey nowadays has the chance of being stonger
and can
show a presence with her possible partners, U.S.A. ,
Greece and maybe later with the participation of Israel
in Middle East. Balkans is the most important vital fact for
Turkey and Greece. Both countries have a deep connection
with historical and racial in this region . The stability
and peace is advantage for both of us. In this respect
Turkey and Greece has to move in a common way . Tourism
is the second way as a second choise to Balkans and
from this point of view Turkey has a good location and
rich. Starting from this point, we can develop our relations.
As we see in the last events Turkish soldiers join beach
landing in Greece during NATO exercise. For decades,
this was the scenario the Greek military trained to
repel; Turkish amphibious forces storming the shores.
Now, it's set to happen. But this time the Turkish marines
are coming a shore as a part of NATO military exercise
that showcases the astonishing improvement in relations
between the two traditional rivals. The last time Greek
and Turkish marines came this close in this region was
on the brick of war in 1996 over a rocky islet in the
eastern aegean sea.
(7)
The standoff over Imia, known as Kardak in Turkish, nearly
touched off the first conflict between two NATO allies
and ended only after diplomatic intervention by the
United States.
In December,
Greece lifted long-standing objections to Turkey's efforts
for European Union candidacy. This year's NATO military
manoeuvre, named Dynamic Mix , is the first time the
two are participating with land and air forces in each
others' countries. Earlier this month, Turkish jet fighters
landed at a Greek air base for the first time since
1972 as a part of Dynamic Mix , although military cargo
planes have landed in both countries in recent years.
From a different
point of view we can easily realize that Turkish and
Greek relations enter new term with business people's
efforts. For example at the second Turkish Aegean coasts
and Greek Aegean Island economic summit business people
say that relations between the two counters are entering
a new phase and that there is a bright future ahead. Speakers at the meeting say that after the visit
of Izmirian
business people
to Athens last month the trade volume between
the countries increased from 600 million dollars to
700 million dollars in a month. Bussiness people stated
that Turkish and Greek relations have entered a new
phase and are improving day by day.
(8)
Consequently,
It is too hard to say and guess the path of the going
way of the relations between Turkey and Greece. Because
the policy all around the world is ragile and hangeable.
Related to this sitiuation, it is certain that there
will be great
differences in the relations. But we must not
forget that the rights of our country are the most important
concept in our policy and lifes. As result of Turk and
Greek at levels a better dialogue is the essence which
leads to better understanding.
_ _ _ _ _
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1)Prof .Dr: Salahi R. Sonyel / Ministry Of
Foreigh Affairs Center For Strategic Resarch Sam "The
Turco Greek Imbrogcio Pan - Hellenism And The Destruction
Of Anatolia" Papers no 5 / 99 Ankara July /1999
2)Alexander Anastasius Pallis "Yunanlilarin Anadolu
Macerasi " 1915-1922/ Yapi Kredi 1997
3)Baskin Oran "Türk ve Yunan Iliskilerinde
Bati Trakya" / Bilgi Yayinevi / 1991 Ekim
4)Doç. Dr: Mehmet Gönlübol / Dr. Cem
Sar, "Atatürk ve Türkiyenin Dis Politikasi"
c 1919- 1938 1st MEB 1963
5)Turkish Daily News, Saturday , June / 3 / 2000 , NO:9481,
Turkish soldiers join beach landing in Greece during NATO
exercise"
http://www.dtm.gov.tr/ead/DTDERGI/ekim98/turk-ab.htm
(Türkiye -AB Iliskilerinin Tarihsel Gelisimi
ve degerlendirilmesi)
http://www.emu.edu.tr/~inaf/turkish/Arastir/aras01.htm
(INAF Arastirma :Girit'ten Kibris'a)
http://www.mfa.gov.tr/Turkce/grupa/aj/06.htm
(TC Disisleri Bakanligi'nin, AB Lüksemburg Karari
ile ilgili Açiklamasi, 14 Aralik 1997)
http://www.emu.edu.tr/~inaf/turkish/Arastir/aras05.htm
(INAF Arastirma:
"Hayal Içinde
Yasayan Lessler..")
http://www.emu.edu.tr/~inaf/turkish/Arastir/aras06.htm
"Esir Aldigimiz Her Bulgari süngüledik,
kafasini kestik..")
http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkce/grupb/ba/28.htm
Türkiye'de Meydana Gelen Deprem Olayina Iliskin 23
Eylül 1999 saat 15.00 itibariyle Anadolu Ajansi'ndan
Alinan Haberler)
http://www.photius.com/thus/thus_index.html
(Turkish Helenic Union Solutions) |